Talk:Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway

Still a stub?
Kudos to Slambo, for adding quite a bit of info to this page. I wonder, though, if this should still be considered a stub? -SwissCelt 00:24, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks but I didn't really add content to it, just formatted it and added the infobox. As to whether it should remain labeled as a stub, I think it should.  Compare this to New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad (which itself could use some photos).  The Big Four was one of the more prominent railroads in the area for its time, and there's still a wealth of information that could be added. slambo 02:23, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Revert comma edit
I reverted to the last edit by User:SPUI. This edit was correct, according to http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/commas.htm : "Use a comma to separate the elements in a series (three or more things), including the last two." Unfortunately, that means the title of this article is also incorrect; I'll be moving the page to the correct title shortly. SwissCelt 00:10, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oops!
Unfortunately, I didn't see Manual of Style until afterwards. My apologies to the Wikipedian whose edit I reverted: Apparently, you were correct after all. SwissCelt 00:16, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

map
Can some-one come up with a map of their lines? Kdammers 04:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)