Talk:Cliché verre

Couple of Issues
First, I wonder about the appropriateness of this being classified under 'printmaking', as photography is not printmaking, and there are no references to printmaking in the article. I am a photographer myself, and so do not know if this is appropriate or not. If printmakers use cliche verre, please amend the article.

Second, the link to the contemporary artist is not someone I've ever heard of, and he does not have a CV on his site to verify that he is established to the point that this is not just a case of advertisement through wikipedia. May I suggest any number of established artists, such as Henry Holmes Smith or Pablo Picasso? Unless someone can verify some sort of notoriety, I suggest that the current link be removed.

Juicifer451 (talk) 01:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Also
Encyclopedia of nineteenth-century photography: A-I, index, By John Hannavy Johnbod (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

"Glass print"
The first sentence of the lede gives glass print; the 2nd paragraph deals with translating Cliché verre; and the section "Glass prints" gives a different definition. This might be clearer if the bolded glass print were saved for the 2nd paragraph and contrasted there with the rubbed 'glass print'. Sparafucil (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I think that might be more confusing - the rubbed ones are an even more obscure topic, & pretty rare. Johnbod (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Image of plate?
It seems a pity there are numerous examples of prints, but none of a plate with the negative image. Sparafucil (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)