Talk:Clickradio

Launch Party
I don't see how the fact that this company blew a large amount of money on its launch party is not relevant to the article. It's that kind of stuff that caused Clickradio to fail, so yes, it's materially important information. 12 Grimmauld Place (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * If you had a reliable source, it would be appropriate. A picture ain't it. Try something with words, published by a reliable source. 69.181.251.214 (talk) 01:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Done. Or, you could ask someone who worked at Clickradio. I can introduce you to several people who can tell you first-hand what Hank did to that company. 12 Grimmauld Place (talk) 01:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Let me guess, you're one of them. Since you're new, I'll assume you don't know about the conflict of interest, reliable sources and neutral point of view guidelines. You seem to be running into several of them. 69.181.251.214 (talk) 01:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I am trying to make Wikipedia better. I included a citation for the claim and I hope we can let it rest. And yes I understand NPOV. My personal opinion of what happened I have not attempted to shove into the article. 12 Grimmauld Place (talk) 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Your citation did not in any way support the claim. Try again. 69.181.251.214 (talk) 02:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * According to AllBusiness.com, Williams stepped down as CEO, and the same information appeared in Billboard (from the same source). I can find two mentions of a lawsuit, which suggest there was some pressure put on Williams, but nothing to verify the claim that he was dismissed. Peter E. James (talk) 00:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

what is the relevence
of the source "New internet radio station of the same name" a seemingly and completely unrelated website?24.115.19.178 (talk) 10:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Clickradio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061026192820/http://www.digitalmediawire.com/archives_083000.html to http://www.digitalmediawire.com/archives_083000.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060818200028/http://www.blackenterprise.com/pages/ibm/ibmOpen.asp?Source=%2Farchive2000%2F09%2F0900-32.htm&p=2 to http://www.blackenterprise.com/pages/ibm/ibmOpen.asp?Source=%2Farchive2000%2F09%2F0900-32.htm&p=2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327072426/http://www.bell-labs.com/org/1133/News/StockMaster/2000_05_09/index.html to http://www.bell-labs.com/org/1133/News/StockMaster/2000_05_09/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050909113425/http://atnewyork.com/news/article.php/358211 to http://www.atnewyork.com/news/article.php/358211

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)