Talk:Cliens

Client (Ancient Rome) and Cliens should be merged as duplicate articles on the same topic. I don't have a strong feeling about which should be the primary name, though I probably prefer the disambiguated English over the Latin. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree, both to the merger (strongly) and (mildly) to calling the merged article Client (ancient Rome), because I think even in classical scholarship you're more likely to read the Anglicized form. You might want to look also at clientela; I could be persuaded, but at the moment I don't see why it needs a separate article either (and the first paragraph is either not true, or true only for a very early period, as I'm sure Marcus Crassus would be amused to know he was allowed to enter into business contracts). Do you know how to do a formal Merge proposal? Cynwolfe (talk) 12:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * More than two years later, this remains. I see four articles that need to be merged: patronus, cliens, client (ancient Rome), and clientela. Cynwolfe (talk) 23:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)