Talk:Climate Council

NPOV
This article, especially the "Projects and purpose" section, uses sensational and unencyclopedic wording such "capturing the public's imagination", "groundbreaking research" "courageous catalyst", "climate crisis", "authoritative and expert", "hold Australia's leaders to account" and "landmark report" in ways that bias the article towards the subject and give undue weight to the subjects point of view. Furthermore, the article portrays the subject in an entirely positive way, and does not include any negative commentary on the subject. 053pvr (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough comment. I'll take a look Gumsaint (talk) 03:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Cut a lot out. Article still relies too much on primary sourcing. FemkeMilene (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)