Talk:Climate change art

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katherinesteinberger.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2020 and 24 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TyBrown06.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Additions added for finals assignment.
Hey fellow Wikipedians! I will be moving the additions I made to the "Effects and influence" section, as well as adding a section titled "Arguments against climate change art's effectiveness". PhillipEGruenemay (talk) 02:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

The citations in the article
All the sources are valid and not outdated, however, I think there's a lot of direct citation especially on the first part of the article which makes a bit difficult to gasp the idea of the original sources. It would be easier to understand the concepts of the original sources if it's paraphrased. Naonoa0000 (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

History section
I think the history section of this article is a bit underrepresented, since it's only citing the sentences from the relevant articles. By making the history section deeper, I believe that it would be easier to understand the following section which is about the influences of the climate change arts. However, I think that the section of effects and influence of climate change art is very detailed and interesting! Naonoa0000 (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Reception section
I feel that the reception section in this article might be a little biased. Climate change art is a subject with many different perspectives, but this section only includes two articles. The idea of Malcome Miles is very interesting, but I think his article is overrepresented. By adding more perspectives on the climate change art, I believe this section would be more intriguing. Naonoa0000 (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The Reception section is too heavily weighted towards Malcom Miles, while he is certainly important and should be included here, there are many other art historians and critics who have dealt with this subject, for example, Lucy Lippard and her 2007 exhibition and the associated book, Weather Report: Art and Climate Change. ,. The importance of the exhibition was recently re-analyzed in Southwest Contemporary Magazine, and previously in 2010.
 * Other works of relevance include:, , , , , , , etc. Netherzone (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Article needs a lot of improvement
I've begun to clean this article up, and it needs alot more work. It does not accurately represent the genre, nor its history well. I've removed bare embedded urls, some promotional content, moved a couple images. There are still a lot of non-notable artists who are mentioned. The article should not be a repository of individual artists works, but should more accurately represent the genre itself. I'll continue to work on it when I can find the time. Netherzone (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)