Talk:Climate skeptic

Skeptics aren't deniers
It is wrong to poinbt this article at climate change denial. That article is more about the organized denial and arguments are irrelevant. A skeptic is one who might be convinced by argument as at Global warming controversy. Dmcq (talk) 13:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree. According to most sources, on the subject, so-called "climate skepticism" is rooted in climate change denial.  See for example: Jacques, P.J., Dunlap, R.E, and Freeman, M. (2008) "The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism".  Environmental Politics, 17: 349-85.   Please centralize this discussion only in one location, as you've started two duplicate discussion on this subject. Viriditas (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The article climate change denial clearly distances scepticism from denial and has citations pointing out the difference. The controversy one describes the general business so it is where people should be directed to. They can find denial from there is it really is what they are interested in. There is a relation in that scepticism is fuelled by the denial industry but that is not the same thing, even the citation you point out distinguishes between the two in the title if you look at it. Dmcq (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)