Talk:Clinical neuroscience

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 16 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ldnelson7.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clinical neuroscience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520052711/http://www.med.upenn.edu/ins/cnst.html to http://www.med.upenn.edu/ins/cnst.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722012911/http://1mind4research.org/sites/default/files/uploads/1m4R_Journal_LONG.pdf to http://www.1mind4research.org/sites/default/files/uploads/1m4R_Journal_LONG.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Page focus
I just tagged this page because I'm concerned that the page is narrowly focused on the recommendations of a single study to increase interdisciplinary work between some medical specialties and with basic scientists. Perhaps the field of "clinical neuroscience" has a broader basis, in which case the page should reflect that. On the other hand, I'm concerned that the page topic may not really satisfy the criteria for a standalone page. Clinicians who work with the nervous systems are generally neurologists, psychiatrists, neurosurgeons, and psychologists (as well as some more specialized areas like opthalmology and audiology). At most teaching hospitals that I know of, a neuroscience department is a preclinical one. Therefore, I'm concerned that the pagename may just be a trendy name for "doing neuroscience research in humans". That doesn't mean that the phrase does not show up as a search term, but that it does not really represent something that is, in an encyclopedic sense, significantly distinct from other aspects of neuroscience. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * so what are you suggesting(Pre-clinical neuroscience)?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Ha! I'm asking more than suggesting. I want to hear what other editors think. The one thing I'm sure of, is that the page as it is right now isn't very good. I can see an argument for keeping the page but expanding it so it isn't simply about one group's recommendation. And I can see an argument that it should just be made a redirect to Neuroscience. And I'm not sure which would be better. I'm hoping to hear from editors who are more familiar with the clinical side of the subject than I am, whether they regard "clinical neuroscience" as a thing, as a real topic within clinical science, or whether (as I have a suspicion) it's just a fancy name for what we cover on other pages. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that the field is very young but clinical neuroscience are mainly interested in developing new ways of diagnosing or treating neuropsychiatric disorders, not only neuroscience research with humans but with clinical populations. The focus is not neuroscience but applied neuroscience. Gcastellanos (talk) 00:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)