Talk:Clion

Valid entry CLion
(following on from discussion at Talk:JetBrains)... User:Walter Görlitz An entry for CLion was valid either way: This removal has two issues:
 * With a redlink while there was a redlink in the article per MOS:DABRL (a redlink was used in another article, so shoring up the target with a redlink to enable a redlink here was prudent)
 * Without the redlink in the article per WP:DABMENTION
 * It removed a valid entry
 * The edit summary "redlink" doesn't cover why - redlinks are allowed in dab pages per above, and even without the redlink it's a valid entry per above. Edit warring removing a valid/desirable redlink at the target and then removing the entry here isn't helpful to readers or correct per DABMENTION.
 * It left the dab with all geo items, so if leaving like that, should have restored the geodis.

Moving on, I created a redirect with possibilities, as the item has demonstrably at least two RS. Widefox ; talk 08:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Nominating for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Redlinks are valid, redirects are also valid (both given the correct qualifiers). It's a valid entry, and a valid redirect. Competing products are notable, so there's nothing unusual (although the product seems a bit early). Widefox ; talk 18:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)