Talk:Clock Tower (series)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) 01:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this submission shortly. I can say right off the bat that I do not see any issues in regards to plagiarism (as I incorrectly declined Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within for before immediately correcting the error after it was brought to my attention). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The article is well written and the lead adequately summarizes the information within the article. Word choice is good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * The statements made within the article are backed up by reliable sources and citations are included where appropriate/needed. Copyright violations and plagiarism are not a concern.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article broadly covers the topic. It covers the development, history, overall reception, and common elements between the games of the series.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article is written from a neutral point of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * The article is stable, it has not had a single revert since 11 September 2016, I have no concerns here.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images within the article do have appropriate fair use rationales and do contain captions.
 * 1) Overall: The article is well written and does not give me cause for concern.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations to and all other editors who have positively contributed to this article!
 * Thanks for reviewing both this article and Clock Tower II. I understand the mistake from earlier so thanks for owning up to it. I hope you have an opportunity to use the On Hold function in the future to better understand its value at creating a dialogue about the article content. TarkusAB talk 05:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)