Talk:Cloone

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.aughavascloone.ie/cloone%20parish%20history.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I did wonder whether the copying was the other way round, but this edit is decisive. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Possible pending changes to semi protection
In a nutshell if anon IPs persist in presenting the same unsourced (notably climate data at the moment) to pending changes that will simply result in the protection level of the page having to go up from Pending changes to Semi-Protection where anon IPs will find it much harder and painful to make contributions (not too difficult if you know what your doing and how to do it). Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)