Talk:Closer (Nine Inch Nails song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jivesh boodhun (talk · contribs) 05:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I am quick-failing this article because
 * 1) it is not reasonably well written.
 * 2) it is not factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 3) it is not broad in its coverage.


 * The prose is choppy. The article is full of WP:OR. Improper formatting of references which are limited. Some urls are even bare. And I wonder who assess this as B-class when it does not even merit a C-class assessment. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 08:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)