Talk:Cloud computing shared security responsibility model

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (It educates cloud customers on one critical issue they are struggling with; which is knowledge of what are they responsible for when they adopt cloud computing. Cloud customers who tend to ignore the cloud shared security responsibility model  have faced the impact of cloud security threats and attacks. The wiki here is mostly to inform and educate current and prospective cloud customers with an illustration of their cloud security responsibilities. More or less it is a proactive cloud security information rather than always looking for a reactive  cloud security solution.) --108.31.153.84 (talk) 12:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (This page is to provide cloud customers with the education they need as cloud computing adoption is on the rise. Cloud shared security responsibilities has always been ignored but however can have tremendous impact if not properly understood. The paper is not promoting any product rather addressing some proactive cloud security measures that if followed properly can help with cloud security. Cloud Shared responsibility model is among the most important concepts of cloud security.) --Fconteh02 (talk) 13:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Firstly, I'm going to assume (but not accuse you) that there is some case of sockpuppetry going on here, since the IP user who commented above has only two edits on this article and the talk page and is also located in the DC area. About the article, however; this doesn't seem to be a topic that requires a Wikipedia article and it belongs someplace else such as on a blog or some sort of an educational website. The article is promoting the topic "Cloud Computing Shared Security Responsibility Model" and is written like a blog or guide, which are not valid Wikipedia article structures. The article also uses first-person pronouns which is a sign that an article is promotional or a blog or guide. Please take these into consideration when contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 17:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * @: It was probably not an appropriate candidate for speedy in the first place. While the creators decision to reverse the draftication was probably ill-advised tagging for issues may have been more appropriate and my personal opinion is the WP:BEFORE may have been inadequate, that is not say the article is in an acceptable state as is. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)