Talk:Clover (creature)/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Clover (creature)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Overall an interesting read. Leave me a note when done please. Cheers, giggy (O) 05:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Lead needs expansion... no mention of reception, etc.
 * Newspaper/magazine publishers in refs need italics. (random example; Boston Globe)
 * "The creature was realized by visual effects supervisor Kevin Blank and Phil Tippett's company Tippett Studio." - was realized by? Not sure what that's supposed to mean...
 * "Abrams described the creature as a "baby"" - does this need to be quoted?
 * I have fixed the things you have noted. Let me know if you have more, or if it meets the GA standard. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The first point makes no sense. They want a description of the reception of a monster? The last two points are nonsensical. 'Was realised by' is perfectly good English, and if Abrams himself is being quoted, why shouldn't there be quote marks? It's not like a 30-storey monstrosity is the image that springs to mind for the word 'baby.' Herr Gruber (talk) 17:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)