Talk:Clubhouse (app)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ProcrastinatingReader (talk · contribs) 22:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Apologies but I think this is a quick fail at this time, in the sense that I don't think it could meet the good article criteria after a typical review period. Some specifics, which hopefully might be of help:

It doesn't meet criteria 1 at this time. There are some grammatical errors throughout, a number of headings contain content only a sentence or two long which makes for choppy reading, and the "Competing platforms" section needs to be reformulated to address WP:PROSELINE. I'd suggest doing the same for the "History" section, albeit to a lesser degree. WP:GOCE is usually helpful in resolving some of those issues. There are also some issues with criteria 3b (some sections go into too much detail and read a bit like a guide). The lead is very short (1b). I'll add that I'm not sure the sources are there for this article at the moment (and in fairness, it is still a pretty new app), but if the other issues are addressed you could renominate it, and another reviewer might see that point differently. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I'll try to make the article better based on your remarks. Anoop (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Did what I could to extend any one-sentence sections. Added more useful information on App Icons, Creator First, and controversies that made media headlines. Can add more information based on being a Clubhouse user and attending townhalls, but the ephemeral nature of the platform makes this difficult. Couldn't add more to "Business Model," as the company isn't transparent about this. Don't know enough to add to the technical section. Hope this helps.BPac180 (talk) 18:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)