Talk:CoRoT-1b

Corot-exo-1b or Corot-Exo-1b?
This is a minor issue, but still: The ESA news release clearly designated this planet as Corot-Exo-1b, not Corot-exo-1b. Should we not follow that? Awolf002 11:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree. The BBC report that was the original reference had Corot-exo-1b.  But the press statement is the definitive source.  There are also likely to be a lot more, dozens or hundreds.  I'd assume they'll go on using the same designation.  --GwydionM 13:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I changed the text to use Exo instead of exo. Should we also rename the article, itself? I think we could request a move to get input by the community. Awolf002 11:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Logical to move. Maybe you should move it on the 10th, if no one objects first.  --GwydionM 12:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia uses the form CoRoT-Exo-1 b and the original press release Corot-Exo-1b. I think the press release should be considered more authoritative. When the discovery paper someday comes out, we should stick on the form used in it. — JyriL talk 19:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on COROT-1b. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20100118162658/http://listes.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/wws/arc/exoplanets/2009-03/msg00003.html to http://listes.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/wws/arc/exoplanets/2009-03/msg00003.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)