Talk:Coast Veddas/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Kanatonian (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Nevertheless they also inhabit a few south of Batticalao as well.  - a few what south?
 * Clans and family organization: this section appears to be about the interior Vedars. What is is its relevance here?
 * Language: The first two sentences repeat information already given above.
 * Consistency, sometimes they are described as Veddas sometimes as Vedars or Vedar. This is confusing.
 * ✅Kanatonian (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I assume good faith for all print sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Th Sri Lankan Civil War and its impact is mentioned, but is there anything about the conditions during the last few months of the war and now. Are they still in camps like much of \the Tamil population?
 * I assume good faith for all print sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Th Sri Lankan Civil War and its impact is mentioned, but is there anything about the conditions during the last few months of the war and now. Are they still in camps like much of \the Tamil population?
 * Ok, not essentila, I realise that it may be very hard to find details on this. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, an interesting article. I am placing it on hold for seven days for the above issues to be addressed. Place any comments or responses here, I have watchlisted this page and will be checking regularly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reworking. I am now happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, an interesting article. I am placing it on hold for seven days for the above issues to be addressed. Place any comments or responses here, I have watchlisted this page and will be checking regularly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reworking. I am now happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)