Talk:Coasting (book)

30 April 2007
I have added an external link to The Guardian article as a source for this plot summary Ivankinsman 18:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Please change article name to "Coasting (novel)"
To match the other articles about books by this author, please move Coasting (book) to Coasting (novel) ... I'll be back later to do some cleanups. &mdash; 23:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Your cleaning-up is much appreciated. About the name change, I am not convinced. The book does not seem to be a novel in the proper sense and is currently labeled and stubbed as travel book. So 'book' seems to be correct and sufficient to disambiguate from Coasting. -- 08:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree and withdraw ... I don't usually read these kinds of articles for content, and simply noted the fact that two of his other works had "(novel)" in their names instead of "(book)" ... I just figured that they should at least be consistent, and that I should leave the Final Decision about such a non-minor change to Some Other Editor who knows/cares more about it that I do ... My Bad! :-) &mdash;68.239.79.82 09:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Coasting (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110711124924/https://www.greenmetropolis.com/book.asp?id=2177428 to https://www.greenmetropolis.com/book.asp?id=2177428

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Untitled
I'm unsure of Wikipedia protocol, and perhaps I ought to make changes in this article myself. But I'd like to offer a general concern that this article, though informative, reads more like a glowing review than an objective information source. I've seen in other Wikipedia entries a notice at the top that the following entry needs to be "cleaned" of its bias. Such a notice would be appropriate for this entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.80.157 (talk) 12:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)