Talk:Coat of arms of Sevastopol/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jordano53 (talk · contribs) 02:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one. First GA review for me, quite exciting. Jordano53 (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Very nice article! A few minor tweaks and I think it should be good to go.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Place link at first instance of Sevastopol City Council in lead
 * "From July 21, 1893 until the October Revolution in 1917..." + "...has been struck down by the Legislative Assembly on July 3, 2019 due to the criticisms..." A comma needs to be added after the years.
 * "...alongside the 2018 Russian presidential election, however was later cancelled due to time constraints." A pronoun should go in between "however" and "was".
 * As this topic concerns Russia, date formats should be "dd-mm-yyyy".
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Very well sourced. Passes Earwig's Copyvio Detector.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Might be beneficial to caption the coat of arms in the "19th century" section. Not very clear what it refers to when reading the article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Might be beneficial to caption the coat of arms in the "19th century" section. Not very clear what it refers to when reading the article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:




 * Thanks for the review and I am glad you like the article; I have made the necessary changes. Thanks, Toreightyone (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Great! I made two slight changes to the article if that is okay with you. Otherwise, this article should be good to go and I have passed it. Jordano53 (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)