Talk:Coccydynia

Suggested template for Orthopaedic Conditions (see Talk:Orthopedic surgery) is Name Definition Synonyms Incidence Pathogenesis Pathology Stages Classification Natural History/Untreated Prognosis Clinical Features Investigation Non-Operative Treatment Risks of Non-Operative Treatment Prognosis following Non-Operative Treatment Operative Treatment (Note that each operations should have its own wiki entry) Risks of Operative Treatment Prognosis Post Operation Complications Management Prevention History --Mylesclough 05:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

OK, above is noted. I certainly agree that this article needs work. I also agree that adding some sort of structure will be necessary. I have started to try shaping the current wikipedia entry into the format above. But now that I look more closely at the proposed format, it seems to weigh much too heavily on surgery. While such a strong surgical focus might make sense for other conditions, my understanding is that coccydynia is mainly a "pain management" condition, rather than a surgical one. (Rarely needs surgery, from what I have read.) Thus, I am not sure how far the above template will work. In fact, the more I look at it the more that I suspect the surgical emphasis may eventually lead the article astray. But I am willing to give it a start and see where it goes. Adding some structure to this article is needed, and at least this is one place to start. T456 04:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I am also not sure whether the terms suggested within the template might be too technical for the average Wikipedia reader. For example, the term "Pathogenesis" seems like something used more just within the medical community. Also, I wonder whether using the phrase "surgical treatment" and "nonsurgical treatment" would be better than "operative treatment" and "nonoperative treatment". Maybe it's my own bias, but "operative" sounds more like a "secret agent" (and the word has multiple other definitions), whereas "surgical" is probably more universally understood that we are talking about surgery in that section (when that section gets written!). T456 05:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Forum link
This link used in the main body of the article is to a question and answer forum. Isn't this a breach of WP:RS? If so, are there WP:RS that can be used instead? Autarch (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Added a picture of Tigger because his lack of spine is very important in talks of coccydynia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Embarraza (talk • contribs) 23:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Prevalence and picture of the girl on the ice
Added The prevalence section and also the picture of the girl on the ice rink showing that she may have developed coccydynia page by falling.

Prevention of Coccyx Pain
An additional of information on different ways to prevent coccydynia, and the images show certain stretches that help prevent coccyx pain.

Coccyx Angle of Incidence
The edits made include an image with an explanation of how coccyx movement is measured using angles of incidence. This information is based on research from scholarly journal articles courtesy of the Cal Poly Pomona University journal database.

New Topic: apparently inappropriate redirect from "coxalgia"

Searching for "coxalgia" in English-language Wikipedia leads to this entry on Coccydynia. "Coxalgia" is defined in dictionaries (e.g., ) as "hip pain," not coccyx pain. The redirect should probably be deleted or changed to point to a more suitable article (if there is one).

PCMartinSeattle (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)