Talk:Cochlear Baha

Article seems rather advertisement-like
This article seems to lack neutrality. It is very specific to a particular company and strikes me as rather advertisement-y. I'm not a wikipedia editor of any sort, but if any editor does come along, could she confirm or deny my suspicions? 130.160.157.15 (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes I agree, Cochlear Limited, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochlear_Limited, is the trademark owner of BAHA and therefor it is very advertisement like since its 100% linked to this company. Actually I suggest to merge this page with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochlear_Limited page. Boegner1 (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)