Talk:Cochliasanthus

Merger proposal
I propose that Vigna caracalla be merged into Cochliasanthus because Cochliasanthus caracalla is the currently-accepted name .Ninjatacoshell (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Support - For the above reason. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Support - I am not a botanist, but this seems reasonable to me. Invertzoo (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cochliasanthus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140123190934/http://www.logees.com/ftg/Vigna.pdf to http://www.logees.com/ftg/Vigna.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Two Articles in One?
It seems this article is about both Cochliasanthus caracalla and Phaseolus giganteus/Vigna speciosa, even though it claims to only be about the former. Doesn't the content on the latter deserve to be its own article? Ackqwattikk Phfisch (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I would agree with this.
 * "Cochliasanthus caracalla" and "Phaseolus giganteus" are clearly different enough!
 * This page is super confusing to read. Symphanticade (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Conflicting Information!
1. One section states: "The purple, non-fragrant, invasive flowers of the "Phaseolus giganteus" are..." 2. Another section states: "The snail vine, Phaseolus giganteus, is delightfully fragrant."

This needs to be fixed. Symphanticade (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)