Talk:Cockslap

From VfD:

"A cockslap or cockslapping is the act of slapping another person with one's own penis or a dildo." Neologism-y dicdef. And, really, isn't the meaning evident from the word? Tregoweth 06:52, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC) end moved discussion
 * del Salasks 08:25, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Cutler 10:32, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, (i wrote it ). First i would like to say that your reason for listing it here is invalid, listing something at VFD simply because it states nothing more than the painfully obvious AND is labelled as a stub means it needs expantion, not deletion. Anyway it's about a valid article about a sub-cultural *ahem* phenomena. -- Ævar Arnfjör› [ Bjarmason]   10:37, 2004 Aug 6 (UTC)
 * We tend to have very good sexology topics; but how can this be expanded? History of cockslapping?  cockslapping in Iceland? User:Ævar Arnfjör› Bjarmason should clean this up if he wants to keep it; as it is now, my vote is to  delete; it encourages kidi-wiki neologia Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 12:16, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * If there is more to say on this phenomenon, then say it. If nothing more has been said by the end of the deletion period, delete. DJ Clayworth 19:27, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Question: "Kidi-wiki"? Tregoweth 17:37, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Contributions from younger users which despite the best of intentions, are a bit of a mess. Favourite topics include Pokemon and Harry Potter.  The sinister side however is vandalism, usually homophobic attacks on schoolfriends, but which extends to slang dicdefs of sexual practices they'd like to do, but are too young and/or have no-one to do them with. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 19:33, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * I would say keep, if there was any evidence of notability in the article. But I don't think there is, and more to the point, I don't believe there could be. Is cockslapping really significant enough for an encyclopedia article? I don't think it is. Prove me wrong, or delete. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 13:38, 2004 Aug 6 (UTC)
 * Delete: I am pretty hardcore about breakouts of articles on individual sexual practices. To me, subtopics are unlikely to be searched, tie up names, and, yes, encourage kidi-wiki, and also increase the odds of getting blacklisted by filters, etc.  The information is fine, but I feel it should be covered in an up-tree lemma. My argument is about granularity, not content, though, and whether we get blacklisted or not is the least of my concerns.  Geogre 13:40, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: slang dicdef (ahem). Sorry, couldn't resist! Wile E. Heresiarch 14:36, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although I'm sure it'd be a welcome contribution at UrbanDictionary.com Darksun 17:51, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dickdef... sorry, should read dicdef. Andrewa 01:37, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Send to Wiktionary unless expanded beyond a dictionary definition. &#8212;No-One Jones 01:50, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless the author or someone can show that the word is in use to any significant degree. Google only shows 108 hits for this word on the Web, and only 19 in Google Groups. It is almost impossible to imagine that a word about a sexual practice could get so few hits. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:09, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC) Redirect to Sexual slang as suggested below by others. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 09:53, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. One imagines that if the article were, ahem, expanded it would no longer be a simple "slap" per se... Fire Star 03:53, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual slang. (I already merged the content.) As others have pointed out, the cockslap article will never grow to be anything more than a, er, stub. Don't delete, because I guarantee that it'll eventually get reincarnated and end up on VfD again. The way to stomp out kidi-wiki is not to delete, but to redirect to existing, in-depth, and [semi-]serious articles. --Benc 20:23, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual slang. -- Stevietheman 06:10, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * As Benc says, redirect only to keep it from reoccuring. Rossami 13:33, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual slang.ScottyBoy900Q 20:48, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual slang. It's not as if there's going to be a vital need for some other article by that name, and the redirect is slightly more useful than nothing even for the most trivial topics. Ian Maxwell 04:35, 2004 Aug 12 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Turkey Slap. They're the same thing, right? Couldn't the articles be combined?