Talk:Cocktails (The Office)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I will review this article soon.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * LEAD, no summary or mention of production
 * Also, no need to cite something in the lead if you cite it else where in the article, so you can remove citation No. 1
 * I would add the Episode citation after the guest stars on the infobox, right after the last one
 * "Roy brings his brother, who "took a bath" selling their jet skis." What does this mean? He took a bath after selling the skis? Or he took a bath while selling them?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * OK, OfficeTally is citing an official NBC document, but it is a fan cite. Might I suggest you cite the actual NBC press release? Here is a template for a press release, the only thing that isn't there is the url, which seems to be broken. (Just because I'm nice, the citation template would look like: )
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neural POV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two pictures, properly tagged. All good
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the review. I believe I addressed all of your comments (let me know if adding the ref to the infobox guest stars is what you meant). Thanks,  Ruby  2010/  2013  02:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, I love The Office. Yeah, that's what I meant! Congrats! I pass the article!--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  Ruby  2010/  2013  16:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)