Talk:Code For Life

I have deleted the proposed deletion notice. I feel this is justified because the reason given for proposed deletion was "no evidence for notability", defined in Wikipedia's guidelines as meaning "...a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject...". The article now contains reference to two such sources independent of Ocado Technology: Computer Weekly, a long-running IT newspaper, and STEM Learning, an education website for science and technology. Code For Life is the primary topic of both source articles, which in my view constitutes significant coverage. PhydeauxLeChien (talk) 10:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)