Talk:Code of Hammurabi

Another go at FAC?
The original nominator seems to have gone inactive without word, but the article is essentially FA standard already, having been more than half way through the actual FAC process. Perhaps another go at FAC might be worth it—, I see you assisted the nominator quite a bit, any interest in nominating the article with me?  Aza24  (talk)   06:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't feel conversant enough with the source material to be a co-nominator; I wouldn't be able to respond knowledgeably to reviewers' questions. But I'd be happy to assist however I can. A. Parrot (talk) 06:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Aza24 Hi! Thanks for the interest. I do actually have time and I would like to re-nominate this. I stopped last time because of life events, though I'd also become a little frustrated by the edit suggestions, many of which seemed to be personal-preference style tweaks with no basis in house style. Anyway - I should have some more time now and would be happy to reopen noms myself this weekend. Emqu (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , that is so wonderful to hear, the article is all yours. I'll keep an eye on the FAC incase any trouble arises. Best –  Aza24  (talk)   00:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's a bummer that your work hasn't gotten what it deserves. I'll try to attend to some of the issues raised by editors. Hopefully you can come back when you have time, as I would be happy to do a source review and perhaps show some sources that I've found. Wretchskull (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)