Talk:Code of Vengeance/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made a few copy-edits - mostly needed commas.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources, which support the cited statements.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient detail without trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Three images used, with suitable tags and captions
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well, I can't find anything wrong with this; I judge that it meets the GA criteria and will list it accordingly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well, I can't find anything wrong with this; I judge that it meets the GA criteria and will list it accordingly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)