Talk:Codex Arundel

Unbound
The manuscript is unbound.

Could you please check this fact. My impression is that although it was not intended as a bound publication in its present form, it is now bound, which is why the order/disorder of the pages without relevance to subject matter is significant.

Amandajm (talk) 23:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Dead Link?
The first External link labeled 'Arundel' is a dead link, as of January 9, 2015.

72.84.126.54 (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Anonymous occasional Wikipedia User.

General Annoyance
I just want to say that I find it annoying that no one appears to have compiled this into a PDF (or similar downloadable format) by now. I see a Web-based page by page crawler (more for a casual examiner), a compilation of individual pages which must all be maximized and minimized individually, and, of course, commentaries and 'introductions' from people who have had less fettered access to these documents. This is, generally speaking, annoying. If someone has access to this document directly, please supply a link to it. Thank you.

72.84.126.54 (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Anonymous occasional Wikipedia User.

72.84.126.54 (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Anonymous occasional Wikipedia User.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Codex Arundel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.fernandojin.com/blog/?p=51
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917120103/http://www.bisbymac.com/index65.htm to http://www.bisbymac.com/index65.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)