Talk:Cohen v. California

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 October 2018 and 12 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shalichan. Peer reviewers: Weinshel, Erujhaider.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Article Evaluation
This article only had 6 references, which was not nearly enough. The references were also mainly citing the government record of the case, so it did not provide more than one view of the case.AstroFan2017 (talk) 02:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback, AstroFan2017. I've placed a template (primary sources) at the top of the article which indicates that it needs more secondary sources. — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  03:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I removed the template. Per WP:MOSLAW, primary sources are authorized, and in some manners preferred for legal articles. GregJackP   Boomer!   19:27, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Does https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/make-no-law/2018/11/the-f-bomb/ qualify as a secondary source? The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Potential References
Here's a list of potential references I'd like to add to this article.

Shalichan (talk)
 * Civilizing Public Discourse: An Essay on Professor Bickel, Justice Harlan, and the Enduring Significance of Cohen v. California - DA Farber (in Duke Law Journal)
 * A Look Back at Cohen v. California - William Cohen (in UCLA Law Review)
 * Looking Back at Cohen v. California: A 40 Year Retrospective from Inside the Court - Thomas Krattenmaker (in William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal)

Revising
I'm going to start on a major revision of this article, including formatting the article according to WP:SCOTUS, revising the references to allow pinpoint references, and expanding. I'll probably change the reference system to Bluebook, if there are objections, please let me know, but the current system cites to the entire work instead of the point in the work that supports the text in the article. GregJackP  Boomer!   19:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)