Talk:Coincidence Detector (app)

Merge
I propose merging this into Triple parentheses. The two articles are almost the same &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 05:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This was before I saw the recent expansion, but the brief existence of the app is notable as part of this phenomenon, and this phenomenon is most noted for this app. &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 05:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I think since we both are the creators of the pages in question, I think other editors should also chip in. Best, Nairspecht   Converse  05:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge I wholeheartedly agree with . This article could neatly fit into a section of its own in Triple parentheses. Do we need to add the merge template? — Gorthian (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It got prodded, so I swapped out the prod for merge to. — Gorthian (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * If everybody thinks that this should have a separate section on triple parentheses, then it's okay. Let's do it. However, I would request the editor to put this under a sub-section and not inside a paragraph. It's tad notable for that at least. Cheers, Nairspecht   Converse  05:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I've now merged this article into triple parentheses, in a subsection of its own as requested above. It's clear that this now-defunct add-in has no independent notability, other than having been a part of the triple parentheses phenomenon, and the treatment there now subsumes everything notable that was in this article. Note that I've removed one paragraph from this article completely; it was an extended, unsourced quote. -- The Anome (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Cheers, Mr. Nair   Talk  12:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)