Talk:Cold core ring/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 16:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. I hope to complete the review over the next couple of days. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * first of all, thank you for writing an interesting article, I learned a lot. Secondly, I think that at the moment it is a good distance from GA. The issues are described below, but the most important are a poor lead, uncited information, unclear prose, and incomplete breadth. I think it will take quite a bit of work to bring this up to GA standard. If you are willing to put in a lot of work in the next week to fix the article's issues, we can continue the review. Otherwise, I can fail it for now, and you can take all the time you need to fix the article, and then re-nominate it. I will then be happy to pick it up again as the reviewer so you don't have to wait. Let me know what you would like to do. Ganesha811 (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Some suggestions for articles to use as exemplars and inspiration: Eye (cyclone), Squall line, Trade winds. Ganesha811 (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

I would prefer if you fail the review for now so that I can get some time to fix up the article. Thank you very much for your helpful feedback. AurumIsGold (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll do that. If you do nominate the article again, feel free to ping me and I promise I'll pick up the review right away so you don't have to wait. Happy editing! Ganesha811 (talk) 22:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)