Talk:Collabera

File:04HitenPatel.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
That file has been replaced by another licensed file

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Collabera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111109072937/http://www.informationweek.com:80/iw500/2010/top250?qNum=2 to http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2010/top250?qNum=2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120401190006/http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2011/top250?qNum=2 to http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2011/top250?qNum=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 06:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Collabera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2010/top250?qNum=2
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2011/top250?qNum=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 04:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion September 2018

 * Lots of references to press releases
 * First three pages on google search show only one reference (2014 )   Mostly just self created links

Iwannacrib (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

COI editing
(First read WP:COI and WP:PAID if you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's policies on conflict-of-interest and paid editing.) The COI editing on this article outrages me most in the way that it is completely overt and transparent, yet seems to have gone fully undetected. Let's look at the five users who have contributed more than 5% of the article's current text (this shows the figures, but for the latest version only). Half of the content comes from, a banned COI/PAID editor. Why were they editing this particular page, I wonder? Then we have, and , who are clearly single-purpose accounts aiming to promote this company, with what looks pretty uncontroversially like COIs to me. Last is, with 5.1% of contributed text, a prolific editor who just made uncontroversial reference improvements, included for full transparency.

Because of these violations of Wikipedia's policies, guidelines and—most importantly—fundamental aims and goals, I have trimmed anything that could be viewed as promotional from this article. It appears like puffery cherry-picked from mediocre-to-poor sources. I suggest that we discuss reintroduction of any of this content only on a case-by-case basis with good faith editors that do not have COIs in this area. — Bilorv ( talk ) 23:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Company Split!
Collabera Holdings is now an umbrella company over Collabera LLC and Ascendion inc. Therefore, this page needs to be changed to Collabera LLC and the information here seems outdated. A new page also needs to be created for Ascendion inc. I don't know how to change the information myself so I'm reporting it here! Icedvanillalatte (talk) 20:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * all of the information in Wikipedia needs to be reliably sourced, so that a reader can tell that it is not just made up. Could you provide some reliable sources that note the new information that needs to be incorporated into the article? (And feel free to try to make the changes yourself. If you butcher it, someone else can fix it. But, on Wikipedia, if you don't do it yourself then it generally doesn't get done.) — Bilorv ( talk ) 12:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)