Talk:Collateral Damage (Millennium)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Daß Wölf (talk · contribs) 02:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

I will review this article shortly. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 02:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Review & comments
Thanks for taking your time to write this article, and many thanks for your efforts in sourcing it :) I very much enjoyed reading it; there are just a few quirks to take care of. Here's my full review: Daß &thinsp; Wölf 03:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your review of this article. I should have addressed all of your comments. The citation not featuring the information mentioned was an error on my part; the sentence was a composite of information from two sources and I left one of those out; it's been added in again now. I was unable to archive the AV Club link as the archive URL would only redirect to the site's main page and not the article itself, but the other link was archived fine. And I believe in this case "represented" is fine without "by", but I reworded it to say "depicted" instead just to be sure. If anything else seems amiss please let me know, and thanks again. G RAPPLE   X  12:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I've archived AV Club via Archive.is. It's not the greatest archive site out there but it usually works on sites where Wayback Machine doesn't. As for the rest, all checks out so that's a ✅ :) Congrats Daß &thinsp; Wölf 17:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)