Talk:Collections maintenance

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Collections maintenance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141008134733/http://unfacilitated.preservation101.org/session5/expl_maint.asp to http://unfacilitated.preservation101.org/session5/expl_maint.asp/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140327062815/http://www.mnhs.org/preserve/conservation/reports/manual-0102.pdf to http://www.mnhs.org/preserve/conservation/reports/manual-0102.pdf/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Structure
The first thing that stands out to me is that the introductory paragraph doesn’t do a good job of touching on the following paragraphs, so that when you get to the first substantive section, it feels abrupt. Some mention of environmental control, storage/upkeep, and adding in maintenance work/treatments in the intro paragraph would help alleviate this. Alternatively, a sentence at the beginning of each section discussing why controlling that section is a key aspect of collections maintenance might help the article flow better.

We could perhaps rename “Environmental Controls” to “Agents of Deterioration”, since the subsections list individual agents and discusses consequences of and ways to mitigate each. “Storage and Upkeep” could likely be broken apart into their own separate sections. The two aren’t inherently connected topics (cleaning of materials can happen in a disorganized space, and an organized space can still be filthy).

I would like to see additional information under Upkeep/Housekeeping that covers some of the preventative actions taken to help preserve and maintain objects and collections. As we learned in our Treatment module, preventative conservation sometimes calls for active measures, and it’s not all about maintaining the proper environment. The article currently includes dusting and general cleaning, but doesn’t include things such as proper housing, buffering, support, and monitoring schedules, amongst other things.

Do y’all think it’s worth including a section that goes into detail about proper care and maintenance for specific material types? Many of our references discuss collections care at the material/object type level, but I fear this would get too granular for a wikipedia article. Plus, there are likely other pages dedicated to the care of specific object types. That said, it might help in illustrating some of the points being made in other parts of the article. What do y’all think? Adding a section on inventorying might be worthwhile. It’s not a topic we’ve really addressed in this course, but it’s an important project for maintaining a collection in good order. It’s also incredibly informative about the current state of a collection’s organization, and it gives collections managers an opportunity to do a quick condition check on objects in the collection they might not otherwise have reason to check up on.

I’m excited to get started on improving and expanding this article with y’all! Sytrohs87 (talk) 23:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi JHU group! Those changes all sound great to me.  I agree that the beginning paragraph of each subsection can use some more information and/or introductory transitions.  I also think the subsections could all use some additional resources - including environmental control, RH, and organization - but we will definitely have plenty of those!  The other sections that I thought could use some more information were temperature and organization.


 * I also wrote down a note about adding a section for prevention and/or treatment to the page. This is an important facet to mitigating damage, so I think it at least deserves its own subsection.  What do you all think about adding a section for risk assessment and management as well?


 * I think it might be a good idea to touch on risk assessments within the proposed Agents of Deterioration section. Such assessments can help prioritize which agents are the biggest threat and direct maintenance efforts accordingly.  We just need to make sure not to veer too far into disaster planning.  That topic feels to me more like management rather than actual maintenance. Sytrohs87 (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I think getting to far into the details of specific care for materials could be too much for this one article. I really like User:Yasminmohamed23's idea to create a table, so we can at least briefly touch on this subject, without having to add far too much information.


 * Oh, yeah, that sounds like a great idea! Nice thinking User:Yasminmohamed23.  We should come up with a list of common materials then.  Here's what I've got off the top of my head:
 * Canvas Paintings
 * Works on Paper
 * Photographs
 * Sculpture (stone, metal, plastics, mixed media, any others?)
 * Decorative Arts
 * What others do y'all think we should add? Sytrohs87 (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I think we could also add fabric/textiles, and also ceramics as their own category. That, to me, seems like a pretty good foundation of materials to base the table on. Arejayem (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I took note of a few phrases in the article that I thought you could use internal wiki-links as well - humidifiers, dehumidifiers, pollutants, temperature.


 * Thanks, all! I'm looking forward to working with you to improve this page! Arejayem (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Missing Information/Updated/Detailed Information
Hey fellow JHU groupmates!

I agree with the two posts above! I think we could include sections on the other agents of deterioration (not just the environmental ones) as they relate to collections maintenance. I found some great resources pertaining to the cleaning/maintenance of specific materials with a rough timeline of how often things should be done. I think a simple table with some common objects could work really well in the Upkeep Section. Considering collections maintenance is something that is done continuously and on a rolling basis, having a rough timeline would put things in perspective and allow for a link to a resource for more details. Case studies and examples (I think, personally) always enhance a Wikipedia page and allow people who browse to have some idea of the knowledge applied into real circumstances, and I've found a few possible things to input for that. In the intro paragraph, where they discuss who would be undertaking this task, it might be worth it to mention that in smaller institutions, various other roles might be responsible for collections maintenance, possible curators, volunteers, etc. MRM5 and AAM resources are missing from the Wikipedia page, and I've also done some research on my own with more resources and links. https://www.nps.gov/klse/learn/management/upload/MuseumManagePlan-2010.pdf

https://ccaha.org/resources/collection-housekeeping-guide

https://sandiegoarchaeology.org/from-inside-the-vaults-museum-housekeeping-and-gallery-maintenance/

https://www.gallerysystems.com/best-practices-for-collections-documentation-and-object-cataloguing/

https://philamuseum.org/conservation/10.html?page=2 Thanks everyone, looking forward to working on this! Yasminmohamed23 (talk) 14:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)