Talk:Collider (website)

=Review=

You've done a good job with all the elements, but there's not much content so I imagine it could be challenged as not being notable. Is there more that you can add? What kind of sections to similar subjects have on their articles? -Reagle (talk) 16:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * There's a difference between a short article, such as a stub, and a non-notable article. There's coverage of this website, even though the current Wikipedia article is very, very short.  Someone did come by once to add a whole bunch of content, but it was too promotional, so I reverted it.  I could probably find some more stuff to add and summarize it neutrally, but it's not an especially high priority of mine.  I was kind of hoping osmeone else would do it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Something needs to be done about the Schmoedown section
Here's the base of it: Collider does not produce the Schmoedown and they haven't for a year. Seeing as how large the show itself has become, and how much space it already takes on this page, I think it would be better to simply give it its own page. Regardless of whether or not it's eligible for that, I don't know, as I am more of a recreational editor and not too involved in the minutia of it all; but the point remains that it does not belong on this page any more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babspage (talk • contribs) 16:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)