Talk:Color analysis

A title change is in order

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved  &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Color analysis (art) → Color analysis – Per WP:QUALIFIER, since there's no relevant disambiguation, the title shouldn't be structured as a parenthetical.

Even so, the parenthetical is misleading, anyway. Tagging the page as (art) implies that color analysis is some sub-discipline of formal analysis, or at least a more general application of color theory than just to fashion design, as it seems to be here. The sections of the page dealing with fine art also seem to be more relevant to the general discipline of color theory than specifically to color analysis. If we decide that the parenthetical is to be kept, it should be changed to (design) or (fashion) to reflect this.

Marisauna (talk) — 15:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Speedy rename as uncontroversial technical request. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 22:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Showiecz (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. SWinxy (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * -- If you look at the history of color analysis without qualification, you can see that the original parenthetical was '(cosmetics)'. I don't think it needs a parenthetical though, just a hatnote 'not to be confused with [colour theory, etc.]'. Arlo James Barnes 17:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)