Talk:Color calibration

I have noticed a secoond article, called "color management" their contents are very similar. Should they be mereged? wh 09:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I will start to add to this article in a couple of stages, mostly regarding the included sources/outputs and a general adding of content in the text. Next in line is trying to make the introduction section as clear and concise as possible. Any help, critique and input is appreciated. TheSuede (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

This article gives some information about commercial products. I would also have liked information about the Open Source alternatives. (I am only aware of http://www.argyllcms.com and http://www.littlecms.com but would be surprised if there weren't more, as part of the open source PostScript/GhostScript/CUPS printer related projects.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.124.246 (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

This seems to be an advertisement for a set of color calibration products. The majority of products listed come from one company and there a number of very opinionated statements, such as "Consumers are willing to spend $xxx" on color calibration. I'd like to see some factual data to back that up. "Willing to spend" statements have significant time and use dimensions and in the context of an "encyclopedia", they must be supported with broad scale, statistically relevant research. Engageme (talk) 23:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)EngageMe

Agreed... removed the section that sounded too much like advertising and replaced it with a single line listing different colorimeter manufacturers.--Paul Vernaza (talk) 01:22, 30 August 2011 (UTC)