Talk:Coloradisaurus

Wording of the taxonomy section
I'm starting a discussion here to get opinions from other editors about the wording of the taxonomy section. Should my original wording be used or should Miracusaurs' rewording be used? Carnoferox (talk) 18:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I have attempted to reword the section in a way that falls in line with what does and does not need to be attributed per WP:INTEXT. A statement like "should be attributed" is an opinion which merits in-text attribution, but most of the rest of it only needs a citation, unlike Miracusaurs's rewording. Ornithopsis (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I think the wording as it was by Carnoferox and also Ornithopsis is best, as it arranged the series' of events chronologically while still explaining how the problems arose. IJReid { {T - C - D - R} } 20:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I've made some slight changes to Ornithopsis' wording but largely agree with his version. See if these edits are reasonable. Carnoferox (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * His edits do indeed seem reasonable. Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 20:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)