Talk:Colorado State Highway 112/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  02:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The route description contains overuse of "continues" and "then". Try to cut down on the use of these words. The sentence "In 1916, there existed a 12-mile gravel road that was numbered as 10-S from Center to Hooper." sounds awkward and needs to be reworded. "By 1930, SH 112 had been paved from Del Norte to the county line.", what county line are you referring to?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The route description should include more detail on the physical surroundings the route passes through. It should not by a dry recital of a map. In addition, did anything happen to the route since 1947 in the history? Can you elaborate on and possibly reword the sentence "The road continued to be realigned for the next eighty years".
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am putting the article on hold to allow for fixes.  Dough 48  72  02:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Dough, thank you for the review. I believe I have fixed all the issues mentioned (except for the images). Any more specifics? -- P C  B   04:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * After a minor fix, the article is now ready to pass.  Dough 48  72  14:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I am putting the article on hold to allow for fixes.  Dough 48  72  02:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Dough, thank you for the review. I believe I have fixed all the issues mentioned (except for the images). Any more specifics? -- P C  B   04:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * After a minor fix, the article is now ready to pass.  Dough 48  72  14:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)