Talk:Colorado State Highway 22

Assessment
Ok, so this article has been assessed, expanded, reassessed and deassessed. I want to know how much more RD detail there should be for 2.5 miles to be a start-class article? Also, this is borderline, but how is it still a copyvio in the History? There's only so many ways to state information. It was mentioned on IRC that it was all in the same order, well, it should be. Both this article and the source are naturally going to convey a sequence of events chronologically. I guess I'd like some clarification. The terse summary doesn't convey all of the logic here. Imzadi1979 (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably a little more could be written in the RD. As for the history, maybe I misunderstood; I thought I read on the scrollback that it was. --Rschen7754 08:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The History section was removed, then rewritten and added back, it should be fine now. Imzadi1979 (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * One thing though that I'm wondering about is all the junctions in the list. Otherwise, now it looks to be a C to me. Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, on the source website of the junction list several of the exits were labeled as "CO RD 211.5" or something like that, but there don't seem to be decimals in the numbering system. Could the website be referring to something else? Also, the website also said one of the junctions is "Fulton Canal". As far as I know, it may be an actual canal or a road, but I don't know which.  Pzoxicuvybtnrm  14:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Normally only other state highway junctions are listed in the lists, unless it's a full freeway, then every exit is listed. Looking at google maps, a few things are apparent. 1) The list is in reverse order from normal, but it appears that CDOT has mileposted it this way. 2) None of it is freeway, so the list is mis-named, and most of the junctions should be removed. 3) Fulton Canal is a waterway, not a roadway.

I made some changes, cleaning up a few things. The kilometer length should be given to the same number of decimal places as the mile length. The abbreviation should be in parentheses after the first usage in the lead. All measurements need their conversions, and in this case, the  attribute of the convert template should be used since the length is part of an adjective. Colorado is a Highway, not a Route state. I piped the link from U.S. Route 85 in Colorado to read U.S. Highway 85, and corrected the abbreviations for SH 2. I trimmed and renamed the last section as I mentioned above, adding in the reference for the mileposts. The last thing I did was update the references to give the publisher/author information and access dates. Imzadi1979 (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2010 (UTC)