Talk:Colt 45 (2014 film)

Requested move 27 June 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Moved. There is a clear consensus to move pages. Des Vallee (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

– Even with WP:SMALLDIFFS taken into account, the dot may be nevertheless insufficient to disambiguate Colt 45 (film) from Colt .45 (film). Colt .45 redirects to the Colt 45 disambiguation page and, if this nomination succeeds, Colt .45 (film) as well as Colt 45 (film) would both redirect to Colt 45. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Colt 45 (film) → Colt 45 (2014 film)
 * Colt .45 (film) → Colt .45 (1950 film)
 * Support per nominator. The difference is far too small, especially since (as I understand it) both spellings refer to the same weapon. J I P  &#124; Talk 00:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support, per nom. BD2412  T 00:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom—blindlynx (talk) 02:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 07:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support and speedy close. Obviously too small of a difference. -- Netoholic @ 07:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support 1st since we can't rely on readers knowing that the other has a dot, oppose 2nd since any reader who does use a dot would only be looking for that one. The 2014 one gets 211 v 248[|Colt_.45_(film)] for the 1950 one.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 08:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)