Talk:Columbia (automobile brand)

Redirect
If this is all the information that can be here, perhaps merging this material into Electric Vehicle Company would be appropriate? NickelShoe 16:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Runabout price
The article says the Runabout cost $750 and then the next paragraph says is cost $850. Which is correct? Or were both correct but in different years? The Autoweek reference says $850. Can't see any reference for the $750 figure.  Stepho  talk 07:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Found part of the answer myself. The Leslie reference (Jan 1904, presumably written in late 1903) gives a price of $750, with an indication that it will rise to $800 in 1904. The Autoweek reference (2006) says the 1903 Runabout was $850. Still not quite consistent though.  Stepho  talk 08:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I can't give you a citation, but I suspect in these early years prices fluctuated frequently. HornColumbia  talk  12:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Columbia
This was a brand name but there is absolutely no sign of any business called Columbia Automobile Company. See the ads categorised under this imaginary business name and then look at the other names in the article. I've been trying to make sense of it for Wikimedia so don't trust what I say in the Wikimedia description, I've tossed it in.

I'd say more research needed! Eddaido (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The "absolutely no sign"/"imaginary" idea is apparently mistaken. See this search. It's definitely "a real thing". A quick glance at those search results seems to support what this article says—that Pope and Electric Vehicle Company merged into Columbia Automobile Company. I didn't spend any more time on it than to search and skim, but the search points toward further reading. — ¾-10 19:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * OK/ Here's skimming a very very little deeper taking you with me using copy and paste: (That company seems to have had a life of 14 days from 18 April 1899 to 3 May 1899)
 * The results of your search:


 * Electric and Hybrid Cars: A History - Page 24 — "Pope's Columbia Automobile Company acquired the factory and by 1900 both Pope and Riker Electric Motor Company's automobile division had become part of the Electric Vehicle Company."


 * The Automobile Age - Page 9 — "The Pope motor vehicle division became the Columbia Automobile Company and was consolidated into the aforementioned Electric Vehicle Comany in 1899."


 * Agreements, indentures & charters of Columbia & Elec. ... - Pa — (dated 1899)


 * Chrysler - Page 10 — Omits the change of operations to Electric Vehicle Company


 * Automobiles, Mining and Petroleum, Textiles - Page 61 — "The motor vehicle department of Pope's enterprise became the Columbia Automobile Company during this time, named after one of Pope's first successful bicycle models. In 1899 it was consolidated into the Columbia and Electric Vehicle ..."
 * The Electric Vehicle: Technology and Expectations in the ... — "Added to Whitney's $1 million, the capital was used to set up the Columbia Automobile Company on 19 April 1899. The two companies each took half of the shares. Pope, Day, and Eames formed the board of directors. The new company ... Ha ha ha on 3 May 1899


 * And the last laugh!


 * Columbia Automobile Company Frederic P. Miller, ‎Agnes F. Vandome, ‎McBrewster John - 2010 - ‎No preview
 * Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online.


 * I got here because I was tryng to categorize a photo. I have no further interest. Regards, Eddaido (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Ah, OK, I see—if that company was little more than an entity on paper for a month, then this article's pagename would probably be better as "Columbia (automobile brand)". Then the names of the various companies that used that brand can all be mentioned in the article without the pagename being dependent on them. I'm going to be bold and move it. — ¾-10 16:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Good work, well done. Eddaido (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Battery vs Cell
The Columbia Runabout is described as having twenty 'batteries'. Battery here really means 'cell', the basic 2V lead-acid unit with its own filler cap. Cells can be packaged in various ways to make a battery. Most people think of a battery as a self contained item, like a 6V battery with three cells in series. The Baker Electric car specification gives the number of 'cells' not batteries, and I think cell should be here used instead of less clear term battery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.200.163 (talk) 06:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)