Talk:Coma White/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 23:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi MagicatthemovieS. Sorry about the delay in reviewing this. I starting getting a flu the last time we talked (on the 27th or whatever), spent quite a few days feeling like crap (worst. New Years. ever.), but I'm all better now. ;)

Anyway, I've spent a couple of hours going through the whole article, and corrected the 3 minor things I spotted: a couple of the grouped references not being in numerical order; I changed "Track listing" to "Track listings" (since there's more than one); and added the track listing of the German promo single. Aside from those, the entire article was perfect, with one exception. The image from the Zapruder film has no fair-use rationale for use on this article. See : you'd need to add a separate 'Fair use rationale for "Coma White"' section for its use on this article. Since there are no other issues, and the article has several other creative commons images anyway, it'd be quicker for me to just remove the image and promote the article. If you want to re-add it afterwards – or if you need help with the FUR – let me know on my talk page and I'll help you out.

Other than that, I couldn't find a single spelling or grammar error, no issues with sourcing (either with quality of sources, or of every individual statement on the article being verifiable to its source), and all other images were creative commons-licensed. I'll do the usual robot-archiving in a moment, but I'm satisfied that this article meets the GA criteria. Congratulations


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * 1) Overall:

Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all of your help! I will decide soon if I want that pic from the Zapruder film in the article tomorrow. I'm glad you're feeling better!--MagicatthemovieS (talk) 24:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I created the FUR and added the image from the Zapruder film back into the article.--MagicatthemovieS (talk) 24:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)