Talk:Combat Aviation Brigade, 10th Mountain Division/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * :: Spelling and grammer errors in the following section: Lead; Organization;, and red link problems throughout the article. Some of the layout is overlapping with the "edit" fuctions.
 * Fixed all of these issues. — Ed! (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * :: The following images: 150px and 150px don't have the permissions section filled in correctly. Without the permissions, these images could face deletion.
 * I think I have added the proper tags for the images now. — Ed! (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good luck improving the article — Pr3st0n (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I have responded to all of your concerns. Thank you for your review! — Ed! (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good luck improving the article — Pr3st0n (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I have responded to all of your concerns. Thank you for your review! — Ed! (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)