Talk:Combatants for Peace

Untitled
First I'll state that I am a member of this organization. In the edit I did, I put the information of the former section of criticism inside the text and removed a dead link. But I think that there is no need for a criticism information or section here. As also suggested in the wikipedia:NPOV and wikipedia:criticism guide, every NGO has someone to criticize it. The criticism brought here is from a political advocacy organization, which does not add information to the reader in my opinion. if we'll start to quote every political organization' there will be no end t it. As suggested in wikipedia:criticism, I think that Critique or evaluation information is more appropriate, and maybe should evaluate the organization. The 'critic' here is a reply to an un-quoted statement done by a member sometime, somewhere.

Itamaritamar (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

How was this approved? This article cites way too much from its own website, when it shouldn't... at all. not even once.

Sgeto (talk) 05:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)