Talk:Combrex

Article is Much too Long
It is not clear to me that this database is popular or important enough to warrant a Wikipedia article at all. It is clear, however, that it does not warrant an article of this length (perhaps 1/10th this length or shorter). Also problematic are the facts that this article is highly repetitive, reads like an advertisement for the database, and makes no significant attempt to place combrex into its context among other databases. Unless there is a valid objection, I intend to either nominate this article for deletion or take a crack at dramatically shortening it when I have time to do so. Originalname37  (Talk?)  12:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)