Talk:Come On, James

Afd: Come On, James
The page is unnecessary to be deleted. Although it is not notable worldwide yet, its significance demonstrated on YouTube and in the city( it is now a very popular slang among Hong Kongers) prove that the article certainly worth existing.

Also, other pages related to culture or phenomenon only yet viral in Hong Kong are kept as well, such as the Bus Uncle page, the Kong Boys and Kong Girls, Hong Kong Cyclothon, Swimming shed and so on. The Come On, James article should be treated the same way.

And one of the main functions of Wikipedia is to get new knowledge, regardless of its popularity, known internationally. Or else, Wiki won't feature articles and news on its front page to spread the the knowledge to its readers. And the other name of Wiki is literally the Free Encyclopedia. A REAL encyclopedia contains every kind of knowledge, has no boundaries and does not cut out any kind of new knowledge that is not "notable" internationally yet. The Wikipedia should be the same.

Most importantly, the article is included in the WikiProject Hong Kong. If it's not for the representation of social, cultural phenomenon of the city from the article, it would not have been included. Hence, there's genuinely no need for deletion of the article.

Terenceterenceterence1402 (talk) 17:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, User:Terenceterenceterence1402 you should probably move your comments here to the deletion discussion page: Articles for deletion/Come on james if you want them to count. AusLondonder (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)