Talk:Command & Conquer (1995 video game)/GA1

Reviewer: Electroguv (talk · contribs) 13:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.
 * Although Three Speech is associated with Sony, I think a more reliable source is needed.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * This is an easy pass which is only impeded by the above problem. Electroguv (talk) 07:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I fixed the issue you pointed out. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 08:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You must have misunderstood me. I wanted you to replace ThreeSpeech with a more reliable source rather than just improve the footnote. Had to do it myself. Electroguv (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)