Talk:Commander Keen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 08:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Let's do this thing. Cognissonance (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Overall

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * It is featured article material.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * The copyvio and external links checked out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It was focused, it was major, it was legendary.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Nothing is more neutral than this article.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * We have achieved peace, at last.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All is appropriate. I didn't see a nipslip, anywhere.
 * 1) Overall: The review produced no notes and as such did not have a single issue. Immediate pass.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Cognissonance (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)