Talk:Commercially available radioisotopes

Merge?
This article can be a section in Radionuclide. Now it reads like a catalog. --Kkmurray (talk) 22:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * i agree --johndoe616 (talk) 24:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The Ionizing radiation article, the radionuclide article and this one perhaps should all be included as one? -- Haruth (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Lead Section
Needs an expert to give some context to this list. Would also be nice to see the commercial application of each isotope. -- Haruth (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There are hundreds of the things. Presently, since all the radionuclide Wikis got consolidated under things like isotopes of tin, it's much more difficult. But if you want to expant on the inforation in those articles by listing uses, sources, and so on, so so. I think the list subject is too long for a stand-alone list, but I could be wrong. S  B Harris 20:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

This whole article and concept should be deleted
We have some list articles about commercial products like list of graphing software, but they tend to be rather short, and construct new lists of things you can't find in a catalog. But there are catalogs of radioisotope supplies. The RITVER GmBH catalog has 47 separate radionuclides in many products for sale, and that's just the first I find. WP is not a phonebook, an auto parts catalog, a chemical products catalog, or a commerical radionuclide catalog. The only use I can think of for an article like this is a list article of commercial catalogs, sources, and suppliers. Even then it would be pretty close to list of spamlinks. S B Harris 19:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)